HomeJournalPortfolio
PortfolioHiringCareer

The Portfolio Project That Actually Gets You Hired

Almost every junior developer's portfolio has the same four projects: a todo app, a weather app, a clone of Twitter, and an ecommerce side project that never shipped. Nobody gets hired from these. This post explains what hiring managers are actually looking for in a portfolio project — and exactly what kind of project converts interviews into offers, with real examples you can copy the shape of.

Siddharth PuriFebruary 8, 20267 min read
Career Growth

The Portfolio Project That Actually Gets You Hired

February 8, 2026 · 7 min read · Siddharth Puri

Almost every junior developer's portfolio has the same four projects. A todo app. A weather app. A Twitter clone. An ecommerce side project that never shipped. Nobody gets hired from these, and the brutal truth is that hiring managers stop reading portfolios around project three because they have all seen them a hundred times.

What hiring managers are actually looking for

  • Evidence you can ship something to real users, even if there are five of them
  • A problem that is yours — something you cared about enough to actually finish
  • A writeup that explains the decisions, not just the features
  • One interesting technical choice that was not obvious
  • A commit history that looks like someone who ships, not someone who panics on Sunday night

None of this is about the framework. Nobody got hired because they used Next.js instead of Remix. They got hired because the project signalled "this person will figure things out and finish them."

The shape of a project that works

The formula I have watched work over and over again: solve a small, specific, real annoyance you personally have, ship it publicly, write about it honestly. That's it. Three attributes do the heavy lifting — real annoyance, real users (even ten), real writeup.

  • A scheduling tool that fixed a specific problem in your college society and now has 40 users
  • A WhatsApp bot that helps your uncle's grocery shop take orders and has 200 orders a month
  • A niche tool for your hobby (chess openings, badminton score tracking, book notes) with a real user base of 50
  • A small Chrome extension that fixes an annoyance you hit daily on a site you actually use
  • A tiny SaaS that five people pay $5 for. The number that matters is "five people paid."

What not to build

  • Clones of known products (Instagram clone, Uber clone, Netflix clone)
  • Projects without a writeup — just a GitHub README with "tech stack: React, Node"
  • Ambitious projects that are 40% built. Hiring managers see "unfinished," not "big vision"
  • Group projects where your contribution is ambiguous
  • Tutorial-fueled projects that are obviously a tutorial

The writeup is half the project

A three-paragraph writeup explaining why you built it, what went wrong, and what you would do differently doubles the impact of the project. Hiring managers are hiring the person who can explain their work, not just do it. Writing forces clarity and signals communication ability — both rare, both scored.

Write the post. Publish it on your own site or on Dev.to with a canonical tag home. Link to it from the project. This is ten hours of work that returns more than another project would.

One project > four

A single project with real users, a real writeup, and a real story will out-convert a portfolio of five projects every time. Delete the clones. Kill the half-finished ones. Lean into the one real thing. That is the one that actually gets you hired.

Nobody gets hired from a todo app. Lots of people get hired from one small real thing, shipped.
All postsSiddharth Puri

Keep reading

View all →
AI & Future of Work

Claude 3 vs GPT-5: What Changed and Why It Matters

March 26, 2026 · 9 min

Claude 3 vs GPT-5: What Changed and Why It Matters

They both claim to be the smartest thing ever built, and both demos look suspiciously similar. This is a ground-level look at how Claude 3 and GPT-5 actually differ in reasoning depth, long-context reliability, code quality and tool use — plus a blunt cheat sheet for which one to pick for which job. Written in English, without the benchmarks theatre.

AI & Future of Work

Will AI Really Replace Developers or Just Upgrade Them?

March 18, 2026 · 8 min

Will AI Really Replace Developers or Just Upgrade Them?

The internet has been burying developers every year since 1998 and we keep showing up for breakfast. Here is the honest split — which parts of the job AI genuinely eats (boilerplate, docs, test scaffolding, Stack Overflow archaeology) and which parts quietly get harder and more valuable (product judgement, architecture, ambiguity). Short answer: it replaces the parts of your job you hated, and the parts that pay you get more fun.

AI & Future of Work

Jobs That Will Survive the AI Revolution (And Why)

March 8, 2026 · 9 min

Jobs That Will Survive the AI Revolution (And Why)

Forget the "creative vs repetitive" framing — the real line is "work customers trust a machine with vs work they do not." This post maps three tiers: jobs that will stay deeply human (health, founding sales, investigative journalism, skilled trades), jobs that will transform rather than disappear (design, engineering, teaching, support), and jobs that are quietly becoming the best bets of the decade. A calmer, less LinkedIn-flavoured take on the next ten years.